I think of that painting my mother had:
the handsome though saturnine aristocrat.
He looked like the humourless brother
of The Laughing Cavalier. Yet I liked it.
And I wish I had claimed it after she died,
but I wasn’t thinking of such things then.
It is long lost now, along with all her other
dispersed or abandoned possessions.
I see him so clearly still, in his place
on the wall of a dear house (also long gone)
in his fancy hat with the swirling brim,
and the lustrous dark green coat-sleeves.
I remember, too, a card I cherished
for its image of the Green Woman:
wrinkled and wise, in front of trees,
like the vision of her I’d once had.
A student begged to borrow it, to copy.
I was reluctant, but she promised
to return it very soon. She never did.
She moved away, leaving no address.
Remembering, I see again, or still,
the image of that nut-brown, smiling face,
the kindly, knowing eyes. I feel again
the deep recognition between us.
So many decades later, the clarity
with which these faces return to mind
tells me the pictures need not be mourned.
They could never truly be lost or stolen.
Written for Friday Writings #154: Opposite Concepts at Poets and Storytellers United.
Possessions (and people) come and go. None truly belong to us in the long term.
ReplyDeleteVery true. I am simply glad of the gifts of memory.
DeleteI love the delicate way you have handled such big losses - and then conclude that things may never be owned - very thought provoking and a pleasure to read
ReplyDeleteThat's a comforting thought- that as long as we remember them, nothing is truly lost. Am thinking of the rather lovely book Farthest Field, in which author Raghu Karnad says "people have two deaths: the first at the end of their lives, when they go away, and the second at the end of the memory of their lives, when all who remember them are gone." Perhaps pictures consititue the third life.
ReplyDeleteIt is open to question, however, whether the images I describe were of actual people. Did real people pose for them or were they drawn from the artists' imaginations? And if actual people posed, were they portrayed as themselves or dressed up playing some part?
Delete(It's true that I invested them with both reality and importance — and indeed, invested them with a great deal of imagination too.)
Yes, I think I just absorbed the poem like it was about a real person... :) Speaks to my state of mind!
DeleteOr to the way I subconsciously related to them as if real, coming through in the poem.
DeleteI can see that fancy hat with a swirling brim ... images and sensations creep in and come back to life in our hazy memories. And then those, too, we forget.
ReplyDeleteYes, funny how memory, and what my dad used to call 'forgettory', work.
DeleteThe landmarks of our youth never seem to leave us. We hang them in our memory.
ReplyDeleteIndeed.
DeleteAs fickle as memory can be, it does have the power to bring us comfort when we look to it.
ReplyDeleteAnd a blessedly long life acquires many such memories.
DeleteSo wise, so wonderfully wise ~~~ lessons learned along the way, sigh.
ReplyDeleteWorth the learning. (Smile.)
DeleteI have been looking for the painting of the green woman. Can't find it. Do you know the name of the painter.? It's not the green lady because she's not wrinkled and wise in front of trees. You've got me curious:)
ReplyDeleteYou're unlikely to find it (as am I; would have found a copy if possible). It was nit a well-known image by a well-known artist, but I think created for the card. And yet embodying an archetype, and one which sparked a feeling of recognition in most who saw it. Yes, a different being from the Green Lady. I think she's a version of this:
Deletehttps://wiccanrede.org/2013/07/the-green-man-the-green-woman-part-i/
A wise way to see things.
ReplyDeleteIn the end, one does acquire a bit of wisdom.
Delete